Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Gmeinder

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 6, 2000No. Nos. CIV.A. 98-2556-GTV, 98-2585-GTVPublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum of the Crawford & Company Records Custodian (doc. 69) and Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order to Quash Notice Duces Tecum of the Dressier Consulting Engineers, Inc. [Records Custodian] (doc. 71).

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that there is some confusion as to whether Plaintiffs are seeking to quash a subpoena served on the records custodians for Crawford & Company or seeking to prevent the deposition, based on a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Kannaday v. BallDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
  2. New Jersey v. Sprint Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
  3. Ecuadorian v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
  5. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API