Legal Opinion

United States v. Nobles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1975No. 74-634PublishedCited by 1,668 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

In a criminal trial, defense counsel sought to impeach the credibility of key prosecution witnesses by testimony of a defense investigator regarding statements previously obtained from- the witnesses by the investigator. The question presented here is whether in these circumstances a federal trial court may compel the defense to reveal the relevant portions of the investigator’s report for the prosecution’s use in cross-examining him. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that it cannot. 501 F. 2d 146. We granted certiorari, 419 U. S. 1120 (1975), and now reverse.

I

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,668 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

1,663 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API