Legal Opinion

In Re Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2007No. 04-0914PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

In this medical malpractice mandamus proceeding, the defendant hospital seeks to recover privileged documents that were mistakenly provided to its designated testifying expert witness. We must decide whether Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 193.3(d), known as the “snap-back” provision, preserves the privilege over Rule 192.3(e)(6)’s mandate that all documents provided to a testifying expert are discoverable. We hold that the inadvertent nature of the production in this case preserved the privilege under Rule 193.3(d) and entitled the hospital to recover the documents upon realizing its mistake,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis MunozTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. in Re National Lloyds Insurance Company, Wardlaw Claims Service, Inc. and Ideal Adjusting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. in Re Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2015

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API