Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Under Armour, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 13, 2008No. 06 CV 3224 CCBPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action, three insurance companies, Continental Casualty Company, Transcontinental Insurance Company, and Valley Forge In- suranee Company, collectively referred to as “CNA”, sued their insured, Under Armour, Inc., seeking a determination that, under a series of insurance policies issued to Under Armour, they are obligated neither to defend nor indemnify it in connection with litigation brought against Under Armour by two other companies, Topolew-ski America Inc., and Metal Jeans, Inc. The case has…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hancock v. DodsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  4. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Murray Sheet Metal Company, Incorporated, and Arkwright Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  2. Stern v. O'QuinnDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  3. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
  4. Cappetta v. GC Services Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  5. Spirit Master Funding, LLC v. Pike Nurseries Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API