Legal Opinion

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 1993No. 92-102PublishedCited by 19,456 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

In this case we are called upon to determine the standard for admitting expert scientific testimony in a federal trial.

I

Petitioners Jason Daubert and Eric Schuller are minor children born with serious birth defects. They and their parents sued respondent in California state court, alleging that the birth defects had been caused by the mothers’ ingestion of Bendectin, a prescription antinausea drug marketed by respondent. Respondent removed the suits to federal court on diversity grounds.

After extensive discovery, respondent moved for summary judgment, contending that Bendectin does not cause…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19,456 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

19,451 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API