Synthes Spine Co., L.P. v. Walden
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendants’ motion to compel discovery and required disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) (Doc. No. 84), plaintiffs response in opposition to defendants’ motion to compel discovery and cross-motion for limited protective order (Doe. No. 88), defendants’ reply thereto (Doc. No. 90), and plaintiffs sur-reply memorandum in further response to defendants’ motion to compel (Doc. No. 95).
For the following reasons, this Court grants in part and denies in part both motions (Doc. No. 84, 88).
I. Defendants’…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Karn v. RandDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- B.C.F. Oil Refining, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re VeigaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Pritchard v. Dow Argo SciencesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Teleglobe USA, Inc. v. BCE Inc. (In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Yeda Research & Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. KGCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Pacificorp v. Northwest Pipeline GPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.