Burns v. Casey
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. C. N. Post, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is a suit for the foreclosure of a lien arising upon an assessment of the property of the appellant, situated in the city of Sacramento, for the improvement of the street upon which said property abuts.
A decree foreclosing said lien and authorizing the sale of said property for the satisfaction of the said assessment, costs, etc., was entered, and this appeal is brought here by the defendant, Casey, from the judgment, unaccompanied either by a bill of exceptions or the evidence in any form.
The legality of the assessment is challenged upon the alleged ground that the board of trustees of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Haughawout v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bay Rock Company v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gill v. PeppinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Burnham v. AbrahamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Rice v. Hanrahan CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Petaluma Rock Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913