Rice v. Hanrahan Company
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This cause involves the validity of certain street improvement proceedings in Los Gatos, had under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730) and the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1441). The only serious point urged on the appeal is that a certain small area included in the improvement was private property. There is, however, no proper record upon which to found this contention.
Appellants recite a portion of an opinion of the Railroad Commission rendered some four months after judgment in the case before us and upon this showing alone assert the invalidity of the whole…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Watkinson v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- McNutt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. John v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Sampson v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Collins v. City of PhœnixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Mathes v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- V. R. Dennis Construction Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961