Bay Rock Company v. Bell
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. R. M. F. Soto, Charles Stewart, and Noble Hamilton, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
—Action to foreclose lien for street-work in the town of Berkeley. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from the order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.
The resolution of intention described the work to be done as follows: “That San Pablo Avenue, in said town, . . . degraded for its full width to the official lines and grade, curbed, guttered, and macadamized, and that cross-walks be constructed across said San Pablo Avenue,” at certain named street crossings, “and that a culvert be constructed on the east side of said San Pablo Avenue, across Hopkins…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Ferry v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Piedmont Paving Co. v. AllmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.