Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Abrahamson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1913No. Civ. No. 1058PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a lien following an assessment for the construction of a cement sidewalk upon which abuts the real property of the appellant, situated in the town of Berkeley.

Judgment for the sum of $160.05, together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum, from the thirtieth day of July, 1909, . . . , and decreeing that said sums shall be a valid lien upon the real estate described in the complaint and that said real property shall be sold to satisfy said lien, was rendered and entered.

This appeal is from the judgment so rendered and entered, on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Haughawout v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. California Improvement Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Geros v. HarriesUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dillingham v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Douglass v. Guardian Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Stott v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Rice v. Hanrahan CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API