Legal Opinion

Fay v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1900No. S.F. No. 1264PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

Action to foreclose an assessment for street, improvements. A general demurrer to -the complaint was overruled, and the defendants answered. The court found that all the allegations of the complaint are true, and that all the allegations of the answer, except the allegation that defendant Reed is the owner of the lot sought to he charged, are untrue, and entered judgment for the plaintiffs, from which and from an order denying a new trial the defendants appeal. If the complaint does not state a cause of action its defects -are carried into the .findings, which, in such case, would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Stockton v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. McBean v. RedickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. San Jose Improvement Co. v. AuzeraisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sharum v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Bass v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Ferry v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API