Legal Opinion
Petaluma Rock Co. v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1913No. Civ. No. 1177PublishedCited by 1 opinion
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action to enforce several separate liens for street work done, under the so-called Vrooman Act, in the city of Petaluma. The sections of the act brought under examination are found in the amendatory act of 1889. (Stats. 1889, p. 157.)
The sole question arose upon the testimony of E. S. Shaver, the-superintendent of streets of said city. The record is as follows:
“ ‘I am superintendent of streets of the city of Petaluma, and was such on the 7th day of November, 1907. ’ ”
“A document is shown to witness and he is asked if that is his signature appended thereto, and he answers that it is.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Dougherty v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Himmelman v. DanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dillingham v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919