Louis DeGidio Oil & Gas Burner Sales & Service, Inc. v. Ace Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
This is an action by a heating contractor against a furnace manufacturer to recover damages for breach of warranty and consequential damages. The jury awarded plaintiff $29,600 and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying judgment n. o. v. or a remittitur or a new trial. We grant a remittitur of $1,750 and otherwise affirm.
There are two issues: First, whether plaintiff and defendant stood in the relationship of buyer and seller or that of principal and agent; and, second, whether the evidence supports the amount of damages awarded.
The parties entered an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Victor Talking Machine Co. v. LuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Klpr Tv, Inc., and Coronado Corporation v. Visual Electronics Corporation, Noark Broadcasting, Inc. v. L. J. (Jack) BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. JosselynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Miamisburg Twine & Cordage Co. v. WohlhuterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Jurek v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Minnesota Forest Products, Inc. v. Ligna MacHinery, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Louisiana-Pacific Inner-Seal Siding LitigationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.