Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Lucker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $6,-582.88 for goods sold and delivered. The case was tried before Steele, J., who granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the counterclaim set up in defendant’s answer, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant.' Plaintiff’s motion for judgment in its favor for the amount demanded, notwithstanding the verdict, was granted.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $6,-582.88 for goods sold and delivered. The case was tried before Steele, J., who granted plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the counterclaim set up in defendant’s answer, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant.' Plaintiff’s motion for judgment in its favor for the amount demanded, notwithstanding the verdict, was granted. Prom the judgment in favor of plaintiff for $7,441.96 and from the judgment on the pleadings so far as the counterclaim of defendant was concerned, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Plaintiff sued for goods sold and delivered. The goods were sold and delivered and the price has not been paid. The defense is that plaintiff is a foreign corporation and that it was doing business in this state without having complied with its laws. A counterclaim is also pleaded alleging wrongful interference with defendant’s business. The court gave judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings as to the counterclaim. The case was tried upon the complaint of plaintiff and the defense of defendant, and the court gave judgment for plaintiff notwithstanding the verdict of the jury for defendant.
Sect…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Clausen & Sons, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Theo. Hamm Brewing Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- McGinnis Piano and Organ Company v. Yamaha International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- AG-CHEM Equipment Co. v. Hahn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.