Legal Opinion

Miamisburg Twine & Cordage Co. v. Wohlhuter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1898No. Nos. 10,868-(238)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Freeborn county, Whytock, J., denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a verdict for $220 in favor of the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

START, O. J.

Action on a promissory note for $660, given for a part of the purchase price of twine. The answer set up a counterclaim to the effect that the twine was represented and warranted to the plaintiff to be of good material, of pure Manila, of first-rate quality, and in accordance with the sample exhibited to the defendants at the time of the sale; that there was a breach of the warranty, whereby the defendants sustained damages in the sum of $1,200. The reply denies that there was any warranty- or sale by sample. Verdict for the defendants for $220. The plaintiff appealed from an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Plow Works v. Niles & Scott Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Morse v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  4. Mandel v. ButtlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. Northwestern Cordage Co. v. RiceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Union Selling Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Ed S. Michelson, Inc. v. Nebraska Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Louis DeGidio Oil & Gas Burner Sales & Service, Inc. v. Ace Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Rappaport v. Boyer & Gilfillan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Andrews v. SchreiberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API