D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Josselyn
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Olmsted county, Snow, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $115 and interest.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to recover upon a promissory note made and delivered by defendants to plaintiff, in which, on trial, a verdict was directed for plaintiff, and defendants appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
On December 27, 1900, defendants made and delivered to plaintiff, a corporation, their promissory note, by which they promised and agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of $115, with interest. Having failed to pay the same, plaintiff brought this action to recover thereon. Defendants interposed the defense that the note was made and delivered in payment of the purchase price of a…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Victor Talking Machine Co. v. LuckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. KnappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Louis DeGidio Oil & Gas Burner Sales & Service, Inc. v. Ace Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.