Legal Opinion

In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 14, 2018No. Case No. 13–cv–03072–EMCPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket No. 341

The crux of this case is that Ford's infotainment system known as MyFord Touch was allegedly defective. Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of the certified classes in the form of the diminution in value caused to their vehicles by the defect. Ford now moves for summary judgment on the classwide express and implied warranty claims as well as a number of individual fraud and consumer protection claims. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Baranco v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. In re Fca U.S. LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  5. BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API