Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 1982No. 81-748PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Although the jury found the plaintiff purchaser more at fault than the defendant manufacturer on a breach of warranty claim, the trial court ruled that the purchaser could recover the entire damages awarded for loss in value of the product and incidental expenses. The defendant manufacturer appeals this ruling and also claims that the evidence does not support the amount of damages. The plaintiff purchaser, by notice of review, claims the trial court erred in denying her attorneys fees. We affirm on all three issues.

Plaintiff Florence E. Peterson purchased a new mobile home,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. In Re Zurn Pex Plumbing Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Fiske v. MacGregor, Division of BrunswickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Daigle v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API