Legal Opinion
Jurek v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 1976No. 45643PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, Justice.
Defendant, Darrold Thompson, appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial in this action for breach of two agreements to sell corn to plaintiff, Roger Jurek. We reverse.
Plaintiff is a farmer, trucker, harvester, and investor in grain. Defendant is a farmer. On February 21, 1973, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral contract by telephone for the sale of 10,000 bushels of defendant’s corn to be delivered in July. Defendant was to receive $1.50 per bushel and was to pay plaintiff 11 cents per bushel for hauling the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Del Hayes & Sons, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Derrick v. Drolson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Sacred Heart Farmers Cooperative Elevator v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Louis DeGidio Oil & Gas Burner Sales & Service, Inc. v. Ace Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the State Bank of Greenwald, Minnesota v. Douglas A. Winter Bernadine Winter Robert J. OsendorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- FMC Corp. v. Northern Pump Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- A. Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Unique Systems, Inc., and Duane F. Lilja, and Cross-Appellants v. Zotos International, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.