Legal Opinion

Minnesota Forest Products, Inc. v. Ligna MacHinery, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1998No. CIV.A. 96-296/RHK/RLEPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff Minnesota Forest Products, Inc. (“Forest”) contracted with Defendant Ligna Machinery, Inc. (“Ligna”) for sawmill equipment and design services. Defendant Jocar (“Jocar”), a Portugese manufacturer of sawmill equipment, produced some of the equipment which Ligna sold to Forest. Ligna installed the equipment, but Forest was not satisfied with the equipment’s performance. Forest filed the instant action, alleging claims for breach of contract against Ligna, breach of implied and express warranties against all Defendants, fraud…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Taylor Investment Corp. v. WeilDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
  4. Anchorage Chrysler Center, Inc. v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API