Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffrey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The charges against the accused lawyer were summarized in the memorandum opinion of the Trial Board:

"The accused, JAMES F. McCAFFREY, has been charged with essentially three acts of professional misconduct, two of which arise out of interrelated transactions. The crux of each of the three charges is, first, a failure to preserve the confidences and secrets of a client in violation of Disciplinary Rule 4-101 of the Code of Professional Responsibility [Code]; second, communicating with a party known to be represented by an attorney without the consent of that attorney in violation of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GygiOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HollingsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Clooten v. ClootenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. O'LearyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re SnyderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API