Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1984No. OSB 82-89; SC S30283PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Ray G. Brown accusing him of unethical conduct in two separate causes. The first cause accuses Brown of improperly advancing money to a client. The second cause alleges that Brown created false evidence by obtaining from the client an affidavit denying the advancement of the money.

The Bar’s complaint was served on March 15,1983.1 The Trial Board found Brown not guilty of both causes. The six member Disciplinary Review Board found Brown not guilty of the first cause and guilty of the second cause. We find Brown guilty of both causes.

For…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berlant AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Matter of ReavesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SmolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedrickOregon Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API