Legal Opinion

Foster v. Masters Pontiac Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1958No. Civ. 22467PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered on an order sustaining a general and special demurrer to the third amended complaint, referred to as the complaint, without leave to amend.

The complaint alleges:

1. On November 24,1953, plaintiff, as buyer, and defendant Masters Pontiac Company, called defendant, as seller, entered into an oral agreement whereby plaintiff agreed to buy a 1953 Pontiac for $3,653.53 and defendant agreed to take plaintiff’s 1951 Kaiser in trade for a net allowance of $910; plaintiff agreed to pay the usual sales tax and license and transfer fees; plaintiff agreed to pay…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. James v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Hernandez v. Atlantic Finance Co. of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Wilson v. Transit AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API