Legal Opinion

Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeToth

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1945No. L .A. No. 19083PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered upon sustaining defendant’s general and special demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend.

*757In substance the pleading discloses the following: Plaintiff is seeking a declaration of the rights and duties of the parties under an unwritten contract of employment. On June 6,1943, plaintiff orally engaged the services of defendant as a motion picture director for a term of one year “immediately next ensuing, ” at a salary of $250 a week for each week of service actually rendered, with the privilege of a maximum twelve week lay-off during…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.California Supreme Court · 2009

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API