Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Transit Authority
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1962No. Civ. 10121PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, J. pro tem.*
Appeal is taken by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendants after the entry of an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer without leave to amend.
Plaintiffs, Wilson and DuBois, are the President and Secretary, respectively, of Local Division No. 256, Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, a labor union. Defendant, Transit Authority of the City of Sacramento, was created by charter of said city for the purpose of acquiring and operating a public transportation system. The members of Local No. 256 are the employees of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Zetterberg v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- AICCO, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Siciliano v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Winter v. GnaizdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.