Legal Opinion

Culbertson v. Cizek

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1964No. Civ. 21070PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from portions of an adverse judgment entered in an action for declaratory relief brought against a contractor, the surety on his performance bond and certain materialmen and subcontractors who are lien claimants.

Plaintiffs Fred and Nell Culbertson own improved real property in Oakland. On August 12, 1958, they entered into a written “Builder’s Contract” with Cizek under the terms of which Cizek agreed to construct thereon three stores with two apartments above them and to convert an existing beauty shop into two apartments “as Per Plans and Specifications” and to furnish all…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Thompson v. AsimosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  4. Gonzales v. R. J. Novick Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API