Legal Opinion
Stasher v. Harger-Haldeman
California Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1962No. L. A. 26244PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action (brought individually and as adminis tratrix of her husband’s estate) to compel restitution upon claimed rescission of a conditional sale contract for the sale of an automobile and to recover all payments made thereunder to defendant.
Plaintiff contends that the subject contract was voidable at her instance because, as she would construe its language, it fails in certain respects to comply with the requirements of former Civil Code section 2982, subdivision (a). We have concluded that the contract complies with that statute and hence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Ridge v. Boulder Creek Union Junior-Senior High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Estrada v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- City of Seattle v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.