Legal Opinion
Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1949No. L. A. 20189PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for the defendant on three causes of action attacking the validity of a transaction for the purchase of two trucks and two trailers.
In 1946, the plaintiff and a former business associate Spurgeon decided to engage in the trucking business. The plaintiff negotiated with Brace, local truck manager for the defendant finance company. On March 11, 1946, he entered into the transaction with the defendant by which he acquired a GMC truck and Weber trailer and a Sterling truck and Fruehauf trailer, and executed to the defendant a note and mortgage…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.