Legal Opinion
Lord v. Garland
California Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1946No. L. A. 18931PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Soon after the Caravan Act (Stats. 1937, p. 2253; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 5136) went into effect, Harry A. Lord sued to enjoin the director and other officers of the Motor Vehicle Department from enforcing its provisions as to him. While that suit was pending, he brought the present action “for declaratory relief, injunction and recovery of deposit.” The director and the registrar of the Motor Vehicle Department then in office were named as defendants. Their demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and the principal question presented upon Lord’s appeal from the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Brock v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.