Legal Opinion
Verdi Development Co. v. Dono-Han Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1956No. Civ. 5331PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONLEY, J. pro tem. *
This suit was brought by Roy H. Tull and Helen Tull, the owners, and Verdi Development Company, a corporation, the lessee, of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 9 North, Range 13 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, against Dono-Han Mining Company, a corporation, and several individuals connected with its operations, to enjoin their continuing entry upon the land and to recover damages. The defendant corporation, having a valid mining claim on public land in the Southeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 9 North, Range 13 West, San Bernardino Base and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kaiser v. DaltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Zipf v. DalgarnOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Robinson v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- John Taft Corp. v. Advisory AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Reid v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.