Legal Opinion
John Taft Corp. v. Advisory Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1984No. B004202PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
—We here determine that the United States Government Survey Maps prepared and recorded pursuant to federal law do not constitute subdivisions of land within the meaning of the California Subdivision Map Act. (Gov. Code, §§ 66410-66499.37.)
The Advisory Agency for the County of Ventura and the County of Ventura (referred to collectively as the County) appeal from a writ of mandate directing the County to release the notice of intention to record a notice of violation (Gov. Code, § 66499.36) 1 which it recorded February 2, 1983, on two lots transferred by John Taft Corporation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pratt v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Soderling v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bright v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Landgate, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Gomes v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Yellowstone River, LLC v. Meriwether Land Fund I, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.