Legal Opinion

Richfield Oil Corp. v. Crawford

California Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1952No. L. A. 21956PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

This appeal involves the interpretation and application to certain parcels of land of section 3600 of the Public Resources Code regulating the spacing of oil and gas wells. The accompanying diagram shows the relationship of the parcels and the wells thereon.

All oil wells are producing from the Colgrove formation in the Cuyama oil field. The dotted line across the diagram represents the Hadley-Stone fault, running in a northwest-southeast direction. This fault acts as a barrier to oil and gas and thus limits production to that portion of the Col-grove formation north and east of the fault.

All…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Bunte Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Estate of MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Harris v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. LicasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API