Zipf v. Dalgarn

The Court of Appeals in this case found as a matter of fact that the plaintiff, Mary E. Dalgarn, had established by adverse use her right to the land lying east of the old partition fence extending from a point at-the rear between said lots up to a point between the houses where the old wing fences, or lattice work, stood; that the dividing line from that point on to the north or front property line should jog over to the so-called true lot line as established by the testimony of the surveyors.

The Court of Appeals having reached its conclusion as to the prescriptive right upon the evidence…