Chandler v. Hibberd
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.
The basic question for determination in this case is the correct location of the common boundary line between two oil producing properties. Being aggrieved by the decision after an extended trial, 1 plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment and from the order denying their motion to tax costs.
The properties in question are in the South Cuyama Valley oil field in Santa Barbara County. More specifically, they are the south one half of Section 25 and Section 36 of Township 10 North, Range 27 West, S.B.B. & M. The controversial line separates these two sections. Section 25 lies directly north of…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Arais v. KalensnikoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Castle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Finley v. Yuba County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Acampora v. PearsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.