Legal Opinion

Bloxham v. Saldinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 2014No. H038040PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

Jacques (or Jack) Bloxham and Janette Magoc (the Bloxhams) and Todd Saldinger and Barbara Saldinger, also known as Barbara Zylbert (the Saldingers), disputed the location of their common property lines. At trial, the determinative issue was the location of the western boundary of the Shoquel Augmentation Rancho (more recently denominated the Soquel Augmentation Rancho; hereinafter sometimes “Rancho”), a line roughly seven miles long. The deed descriptions of the parties’ parcels at issue include calls to that western boundary line of the Rancho (hereinafter Rancho line).

The…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. MacIelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Doe v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Arnold Eng'g Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. City of Glendale v. Marcus Cable Associates, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Belle Terre Ranch, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Cantu v. Hermansen CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API