Kaiser v. Dalto
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. James A. Devoto, and Devoto, Richardson & Long, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from entering upon a strip of land, alleged to belong to plaintiff, along the north side of his lot, forty-six feet and six inches long and five and three-fourths inches wide, and from building a wall and committing other trespasses thereon. The case was tried before the court, findings filed, and judgment entered for plaintiff, granting the injunction as prayed. Defendants have not appealed from the judgment. They made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the order denying the motion. The first point…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Martin v. MatfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Goldberg v. Sisseton Loan & Title Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Mentone Irrigation Co. v. Redlands Elec. Light & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Brown v. MaceyIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.