Kentner v. Gulf Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
We allowed review of this case primarily to determine whether proof of reckless indifference is sufficient to establish the scienter element for statutory insurance fraud. We hold that it is but nevertheless affirm the reversal and remand entered by the Court of Appeals for a different reason.
While the principal question is not complex, this case presents several other questions. For this reason, we must recite some of the lengthy history of this case.
Plaintiffs Kentners, husband and wife, purchased a homeowners’ insurance policy, which included fire insurance coverage, from defendant Gulf…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Eslamizar v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Callaway v. Sublimity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Nancy Kraus v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Progressive Specialty Insurance v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.