Legal Opinion
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBride
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 26, 1983No. CA A23657, SC 29101PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
In this declaratory judgment action plaintiff insurer alleged that defendant insureds committed fraud or false swearing, thus rendering their fire insurance policy void, ORS 743.612. Following a jury verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the trial court ordered a new trial on grounds that the jury had been erroneously instructed regarding the measure of proof. The Court of Appeals affirmed per curiam, 60 Or App 168, 652 P2d 382 (1982), citing Transamerica v. Bloomfield, 55 Or App 31, 637 P2d 176 (1981). We allowed review to decide whether proof of fraud or false swearing, in an action to void a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Zockert v. FanningOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Sobel v. Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.