Legal Opinion

Eslamizar v. American States Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 26, 1995No. C910651CV; CA A78747PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of defendant, assigning error to the trial court’s failure to grant plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict on defendant’s affirmative defenses and to the form of verdict submitted to the jury. We reverse and remand.

We view the facts in the light most favorable to defendant and extend to defendant the benefit of every reasonable inference that may be drawn from the evidence. Shockey v. City of Portland, 313 Or 414, 422, 837 P2d 505 (1992) , cert den_US_, 113 S Ct 1813, 123 L Ed 2d 444 (1993) .

Plaintiff owned a restaurant,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Masood v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API