Legal Opinion

Progressive Specialty Insurance v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1994No. CC-89-105; CA A72342PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiff Progressive Specialty Insurance Company (Progressive) seeks to rescind a motor vehicle liability insurance policy on the basis of material misrepresentations on the application for insurance. The trial court denied relief, and Progressive appeals. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and affirm.

In the fall of 1989, defendant Barry Carter (Barry) contacted his insurance agent, Johansen, to obtain motor vehicle liability insurance for himself, his wife and his 14-year-old daughter, who was permitted to drive the family car on occasion. Because of Barry’s poor driving record, however,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Viking Insurance v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hanneman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Story v. SAFECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Holman v. Pacific Health & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API