Legal Opinion

Kentner v. Gulf Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1984No. SC S30307 30999 CA A26069 TC 25403PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This case is back before us on defendant Gulf Insurance Company’s petition for rehearing. The petition requests that we withdraw that portion of our opinion in Kentner v. Gulf Ins. Co., 297 Or 470, 686 P2d 339 (1984), which holds that under ORS 743.045(1) it was prejudicial error to permit the plaintiffs application for the insurance policy to be received in evidence.

Among the points relied upon by the defendant for rehearing is the following:

“1. Introduction of the application, if error, was invited error. It was the plaintiffs themselves, not defendant, who introduced the application into…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of SinkaWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Vanek v. KirbyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Patterson v. Horsefly Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Eslamizar v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Fleming v. United Services Automobile Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API