Legal Opinion
Callaway v. Sublimity Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 1, 1993No. 9101-00207; CA A73082PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
In this action for breach of an insurance contract, defendant Sublimity Insurance Company (Sublimity) appeals a judgment for plaintiffs entered after the trial court denied its motion for a directed verdict. We reverse.
In October, 1989, plaintiffs bought a used 1989 Ford pickup and had it insured by Sublimity against losses, including theft loss. The truck was stolen in February, 1990. After Sublimity denied plaintiffs’ claim for the loss, plaintiffs sued to recover their attorney fees and $22,085.54, the alleged value of the truck. Sublimity raised an affirmative defense that plaintiffs had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Eaid v. National Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Henricksen v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Northern Security Insurance v. HatchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Eslamizar v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Allstate Insurance v. BreedenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Flores v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Allstate Insruance v. BreedenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.