Legal Opinion

Walker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

— The pleadings in this case are very lengthy and it is impracticable to reproduce them in this opinion. The main controversy, however, is as to the alleged misrepresentations in regard to the age of the machines covered by the policies. As a general rule, the later the model the greater value an automobile seems to have in the eyes of the purchasing public, although this is not always or necessarily true with respect to second-hand machines, which is the case here. There is no doubt, and it is not denied, that the year model of a number of these machines was improperly stated in the covering…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Germania Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wright v. Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Treadgold v. WillardOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Easton v. QuackenbushOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Northwestern National Insurance v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  2. Journal Pub. Co. v. General Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Reed v. Commercial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sentinel Life Ins. Co. v. BlackmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  5. Williams v. Pacific States Fire Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API