Legal Opinion

Kentner v. Gulf Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1983No. 25403; CA A26069PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover fire insurance proceeds from defendant Gulf Insurance Company (Gulf). Gulf interposed affirmative defenses to the effect that it was not on the risk at the time the fire occurred and that plaintiffs were barred from recovering on the policy because they made material misrepresentations both in applying for the policy and in their proof of loss. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s judgment for Gulf, which was entered after the jury returned a general verdict in Gulfs favor. Gulf cross-appeals, contending that it is entitled to greater costs than…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rice v. McAlisterOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bunn v. MONARCH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Waller v. City of New York Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Henricksen v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. BattsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Wells v. American States Preferred Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  3. Rogers v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Eslamizar v. American States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Kentner v. Gulf InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API