McDonell v. Union Trust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Garnishment proceedings by Archibald McDonell and Patrick W. O’Connor, copartners as McDonell Bros. & Company, against the Union Trust Company as garnishee defendant of the Traverse City, Leelanau & Manistique Railroad Company. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and the garnishee defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
An insuperable objection to the review of the questions discussed in this cause is the want óf findings of fact or law. We have often held that in such cases we cannot examine the testimony to see whether it supports the judgment. Van Middlesworth v. Van Middlesworth, 32 Mich. 183; Plumer v. Abbey, 39 Mich. 167; Hedges v. Hibbard, 46 Mich. 551; Green v. Gill, 47 Mich. 86; Wertin v. Crocker, 47 Mich. 642; Irwin v. Schlief, 48 Mich. 237; Morgan v. Botsford, 82 Mich. 153; Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440; Child v. City of Jackson, 93 Mich. 503; Merrill v. Newton, 99 Mich. 229; Gemberling v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Hubbard v. GarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Wertin v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Green v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Gemberling v. LazarusMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Simon v. ZarevichMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Robbins v. Simons Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Wilson v. HugusMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.