Legal Opinion
Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1912No. Docket No. 87PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error to Oakland; Murphy, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Andrew L. Moore against the Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Company for the conversion of certain shares of stock. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
In this suit, the plaintiff is not asking that the defendant be compelled to transfer to him upon its books shares of defendant’s capital stock. He sues for money, declaring upon the common counts in assumpsit, and also upon the following special count:
“For that whereas, heretofore, to wit, on the 6th day of December, 1910, the said plaintiff was the owijer of certificate No. 22 of the common capital stock of the said Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Company for forty (40) shares, at the par value of ten ($10.00) dollars each, originally issued to H. R. Bachert, and by the said H. R. Bachert…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New York & New Haven Railroad v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Union Trust Co. v. Preston National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Griffin v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Geo. A. Hormel Company v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Alexander Hamilton Institute v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
- Edward W. Alexander Co. v. GriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Federal Audit Co. v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.