Simon v. Zarevich
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Webster (Clyde I.), J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by James J. Simon .against Ljubica Zarevich for the amount of a judgment. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
In this cause, tried without a jury, there are no findings of fact and law. In a colloquy between court and counsel at the conclusion of the trial the court stated his views upon one question in the case but no exception was taken to the opinion announced. There is nothing before us to review. Circuit Court Rule No. 45; sections 12586, 12587, 3 Comp. Laws 1915; Wilson v. Hugus, 163 Mich. 577; Sparling v. Smeltzer, 140 Mich. 461; Kooman v. DeJonge, 186 Mich. 292; Messer v. Dornbus, 210 Mich. 46. And in such cases we cannot examine the testimony to see whether it supports the judgment. See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Kooman v. De JongeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Messer v. DornbosMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilson v. HugusMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Sparling v. SmeltzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gervickes v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Michigan Central Railroad v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Mills v. General Discount Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Buitendorp v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Buitendorp v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.