Legal Opinion

Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Jennie H. Markey and A. Ottilie Comfort, against the Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, of Newark, New Jersey. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Ostrander, O. J.

The cause was tried by the court. No findings of fact or of law were requested or were made. A judgment was rendered for defendant. There are twelve assignments of error, six of which purport to be based upon rulings admitting testimony over plaintiffs’ objections, and six of which allege, in substance and effect, that it was error to render a judgment for defendant. It appears from the record that the first assignment is not based upon an exception, nor was the question objected to answered by the witness. The second is based upon no exception to the ruling. As to two others,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Township of Cumming v. SchickMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Child v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. In re the Estate of BuchanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Silfver v. DaenzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API