Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Simons Sales Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1922No. Docket No. 93PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Tappan (Harvey), J., presiding. Replevin by Morris Robbins against the Simons Sales Company for the possession of an automobile. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiff brought replevin for an automobile sold to him by defendant, of which defendant claimed possession under a title retaining contract. At the opening of the trial, plaintiff’s counsel “advised the court that his client had chosen not to proceed with the case.” Defendant’s counsel then waived the return of the vehicle and elected to take judgment for the. amount of its special interest therein. Proof of such interest was offered and judgment entered for defendant for $1,250. The case was tried by the court without a jury. There was no request for findings, nor were any made or filed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haines v. SaviersMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McDonell v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Nichol v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Wilson v. HugusMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cope-Swift Co. v. John Schlaff Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Buitendorp v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Buitendorp v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Sherman v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Sherman v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API