Haines v. Saviers

It is stated in the commencement of the record in this case that “the following testimony was introduced, which is all that was offered by the parties.” The case appears to have been tried before the court without a jury.

Two errors are assigned: (1) That the court erred in admitting evidence, and (2) that he erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff.

1. No exception was taken to the ruling of the court upon the evidence. Therefore such ruling cannot be reviewed in this Court.

2. No written demand for a written finding of facts and law was filed, nor did the judge make and file any such…